tv The Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN July 2, 2011 6:00pm-7:00pm EDT
iowa of course kicks off the campaign season with the iowa caucuses early next year. and a shift in the iowa staff for republican herman cain to tell you about. two iowa top staffers have resigned in what the campaign is down praying as routine changes. i'm don lemon. see you back here an hour from now. the situation room with wolf blitzer starts now. bill clinton on the republicans he says will be most threatening to president obama in 2012. stand by for my one-on-one interview with the former president of the united states. we'll talk about the campaign, the economy and much more, including a topic that made him get rather emotional. and an office space is empty leased by the federal agency for millions and millions of dollars. this hour u.s. taxpayers on the hook for what's being called an outrageous waste of money. in the line of fire. cnn is embedded with u.s. troops in afghanistan when the taliban
attack. we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in the situation room. a special gathering to tackle america's serious economic problems. key figures from government, business and academia came together this week in chicago for the clinton global might be difference america conference. the event was the brainchild of former president bill clinton. i sat down with him in chicago for a candid interview on the country's debt crisis, the 2012 presidential race, and much more. >> mr. president, thanks very much for joining us. good to be here. first time you've done this as far as the u.s. economy is concerned. normally it's global issues. and i want to get to that, but let's talk about some of the big issues right now. jobs, jobs, jobs. it's a crisis, a game of chicken going on in washington right now between the president, the did democrats on one side, republican leadership on the
other side. how big of a deal is this august 2nd deadline for raising the debt ceiling? >> well, because i haven't been in government in a long time, i don't know what options the treasury department will have if the debt kreceiling is not lift. my guess is they can pay the bills for a while, after which they won't be able to. so if we let that deadline come and go and we really raise questions about when or political system is mature enough even to pay its bills, i think it's trouble. i realize the idea of voting against raising the debt ceiling has always had great appeal to people. even in good times, a bunch of people vote against raising it because it looks like a free vote. >> when he was senator, president obama didn't vote to raise the debt ceiling. he regrets it now. >> but, you know, when you're not president and you think the vote's there, seems like a
freebie and you can say i did to protest this. but that's a reason that most governments in most countries don't even think about having a vote on this because they know that the reason they have to raise the debt ceiling is because of the decisions that have already been made, not what will be made. so we really can't afford to let anybody in the rest of the world who are willing to put -- people willing to put capital in this country think that we don't pay our debts. that's like saying we -- >> what would the consequences of the u.s. not paying its debts going into default, if you will, or bankruptcy, whatever you want to call it, what would the consequences be for average people out there who are worried? >> the most likely consequence in a hurry is that all interest rates would go up. and so for the government, that means that the did testify sit would increase more, that the
debt would increase more because we'd have to pay more to borrow money to cover our debts. and you can't -- those things don't increase in a vacuum which means that interest rates on your credit card, on your college loan, on your home mortgage, on your car could go up. >> this is a big deal. >> it's a big deal. >> that august 2nd deadline is a hard dead line? >> i know it's a hard deadline in the sense that just letting it happen will have at the very least a short term adverse effect on our standing in the world, on our credit, on people thinking we're a grown up country who know what we're doing. now, how bad the long term damage is will be determined by how quickly we recommendky it, but it's -- since it's never happened before, it's impossible to be absolutely specific. but what you're really saying if you don't raise the debt limit
is not you want to balance the budget in the future. it's, i'm sorry, i'm so mad i can't get my way, i'm not going to pass the debt. we can't afford to do it. >> how do you resolve it? there is a compromise in the work, but it will be painful for both sides. republicans say they're not going to raise taxes in this current economic environment under any circumstances. is there a deal if they hold firm? >> well, there may be a short term deal. i don't think there's a long term deal. because what they're really saying is that the tax rates which prevailed on people in our income group, upper income people, when i was president will never allowed -- >> 39.6%. it's gone down to 35%. >> will never be allowed to go back into effect even though those are the best economic years the country ever had. and the second pour years was the only time since 1980 when the bottom 20% of earners
incomes in percentage terms went up as muches a the top 20%. >> the house of representatives -- they won't vote for a tax hike. >> conservative republicans say we ought to go back to those rates. what they call a cho miz is they take 990% of what they want instead of 100% and then the democrats get nothing. >> i understand that, but i don't think we should be raising taxes or cutting spending. what i believe what they should do is to try to make a ten year agreement and set targets and work back from it because hf--- the way, i'm not alone in that. the bowles simpson commission report which was very tough on
the specifics and quite detailed recommends that we don't start this until the economy is fully in recover. >> senator rand paul told me he would vote to raise the debt creeling if there were certain conditions including a commitment for a balanced budget amendment. is that a good idea? >> i don't think so. i hate these deficits-mf. >> governors have to deal with budget amendments. >> they do. but the governors don't have to deal with national emergencies either. the balanced budget amendments are good for the governors because they impose fiscal discipline and keep them from borrowing money in a sense to cover current expenditures. it would be like a family borrowing money to eat dinner every night. and the federal government does that. but on the other hand, the governors are able to take on long term debt in the form of bond issue, for example, as long as there a revenue stream to
cover that. we mesh it all together. when i was president, i appointed governor corzine, who was then in the private sector, to a commission to look at whether we ought to have an investment budget in america and i still would like it revisit that. i wouldn't have any problem with a balanced budget amendment to cover current expenditures only and was suspended whenever there was a recession. but a national government has to be able to spend in a recession to overcome the collapse of private investment. >> you said this week at your conference that there's $2 trillion sitting on the sidelines right now, the banks, corporations, individuals have. they're just sitting on it because they're nervous about using that money, investing it to create jobs. >> corporations have $2 trillion in cash that they have not yet committed. american corporations with world operations, they haven't committed to overseas operations or to give back either in the form of dividends and shareholders or compensation to
management and employees. they want to spend substantial amount of that money here, but they haven't yet. the banks have more than $2 trillion in cash not committed to loans to support hones. at conservative ratios, let's say 8 to 12 to 1. now, in that $2 trillion is about $160 billion in potential direct exposures from bad mortgages. but the bank of america settlement yesterday is a good indication of what i hope will happen throughout the market because once they get that whole thing put into place, the really great things about that settlement will not -- >> because if they use that money to stimulate the economy and get jobs going in the private sector that would be wonderful. >> absolutely. see, this money they're -- >> you can't blame them for being nervous. >> let me say what bank of america will have. bank of america will lose profits for six months, yeah, but by giving this money to the bond holders and the other people holding these mortgages
that they sold, they also will acquire the ability to write down or have someone for them write down all the mortgages to their present value of the homes for everybody who can afford to make that kifrpd mortgage payment and then for everybody else, it will be clear foreclosure is the only option. we can clean up the bank books, keep a lot of people in their homes still worried about losing them. and if everybody would follow this lead, will could lift an enormous and psychological burden off the country. so the banks have a lot of money. we have to figure out how to get it invested. >> easier said than done. >> but i think green energy is the way do it. if we retrofitted all the buildings, could yyou could get these savings guaranteed. just let them be financed from utility bill reductions. which means there has to be a
loan period greater then the two or three years banks are normally comfortable making them. and the government can make one or two changes and make that happen and thob would lose any money. >> and in the process you'd create a lot of jobs. >> you'd create 7,000 jobs for the billion dollars you invesin. the highest return you could imagine. and construction and manufacturing, you get more than two jobs in the rest of the economy for every one job you create. >> we have much more of my interview. up next, he rates the republican presidential field. >> i like governor huntsman, i like governor romney. i think governor romney is doing a better job this time than he did last time. >> and stephen colbert sets up a political action committee. is it just political satire or is he serious? stay with us. losing your chex mix too easily?
the motorola expert from sprint. its powerful tools help you work faster and smarter so you can get back to playing "angry birds." it lets you access business forms on the go, fire off e-mails with the qwerty keypad, and work securely around the world so you can get back to playing "angry birds." it's the android-powered phone that mixes business with pleasure. so let's get our work done, america, so we can all get back to playing "angry birds." the motorola expert from sprint. trouble hearing on the phone? visit sprintrelay.com. let's get back to my interview with bill clinton as we turn to politics and the race
for the white house. how worried are you right now about president obama getting reelected? >> well, on today's facts, i'll be surprised if he's not reelected. i think people understand this recession was more severe thant one i had. and if you just look at what's going on in michigan, terrible year for the democrats in michigan in 2010, but the united states on the day barack obama became president had 2% of the world's markets with these high powered batteries to make hybrid and all heck vehicelectric vehi. today we have 20% of the world market thbecause of incentive that's put in fp we have over 30 new battery factories, 18 of them in michigan built or under construction. i can give you other examples where they're going forward. i think he's got a good story to tell.
if you look at this auto investment, he didn't bail out the automobile industry. he said i'll help you if you restructure and be competitive. there are now about 80,000 more americans with auto jobs not counting all the jobs that have been saved for the supplier, seller, all of this. and i think that that's going to look pretty good-mf. >> do you talk to the president a lot about this stuff? >> not a hot, blot, but some. he's got plenty to do. he's got the afghanistan problem, the libya problem, the whole range of other issues. if they want me to do something, they ask and we talk. >> so you wait for a phone call? >> absolutely. >> you never initiate anything? >> i don't think i should. he knows that i support in general what he's trying to do and i'm out here trying to explain to people. but he's got a good team and, you know, i talk to xwegene
sperling for time to time. >> he worked for you. >> and he's a good man. but i talked to joe biden last week about some of these economic issues. but i think it's important, you know, not to get politics confused with the action because i believe if people understand the choices, then the only way he will lose is if a republican gets nominated who has a more credible plan and more rapid, more broadly based cover recovery. >> who is the strongest republican candidate out there? >> i can't tell you that. i'll be surprised if the president doesn't win. i've always thought pro growth, pro business, pro labor democrat. i like governor huntsman, i like governor romney. i think governor romney is doing a better job it this time than he did last time. he's moor comfortable and seems to be willing to take some of the heat you get if you stand up
to people in your own party that you think are in his case too far to the right. but i don't know who is going to win. i'm not surprised that congresswoman bachmann's off to a good start because she's a compelling public figure. i don't agree with her on a lot of thing, but i think she comes across as real. and they've got other candidates that are quite good. i don't think we can tell yet. we have to let it play out. the main they think i want to do -- look, i had two republican governors here at this conference. former chairman of the democratic party bought a car plant in china and moved to america and he put the first one in mississippi with haley barbour, the former chairman of the republican party. if he would do more of this in waup washington, we'd get further. i'm just trying to solve practical problems. one last thing on the substance
here. there are -- we have to create about 15 million jobs in the next few years to have real normal growth. and we've got probably 13 million just to get back where we were on the day that the economy collapsed. there are 3 million job openings today in america and they are only being filled half as fast as they have been filled in every previous recovery period. why is that? we had a whole session on that yesterday. and one of the best things that will come out of this is what michael thurman, the former labor commission of georgia, said about what he did in giving training money directly to employers saying don't hire them until we see how they do. but here's the training money. you train them to suit yourself. don't say they don't have the skills. train them to suit yourself. they won't be treated as employees. we need ideas like that. just think about it. if those 3 million people were going to work at a regular basis by now, america would have 2 million more jobs.
the world psychologically would be very different. >> syria, libya, afghanistan and more up next, bill clinton weighs in on u.s. foreign policy. does he back everything president obama is doing? and the former president has an emotional moment when i ask him about his wife. you'll want to hear what he says he's learning from her.
now to the final part of my interview with former president bill clinton and his thoughts on some of the crisis situations the united states faces around the world. i remember going with you to rwanda in 1998. when president obama announced he was going to support tomahawk cruise missile strikes fearing genocide, he referred to rwanda, he didn't want another rwanda. was the president correct in launching u.s. missile strikes against targets in libya based on what happened in part because he didn't want another rwanda? >> first of all, i strongly support what die he did.
and as you know, the secretary of state did, too. hillary did, too. i think it is unlikely that gadhafi would, because he was in power already, would have gone out to kill 10% of the country the way they did in rwanda in 90 days because he was in power. but we know that he was prepared to kill a whole lot of people who were innocent civilians who weren't basically in lock step with him. and so, yes, i think anytime we can prevent that, particularly in the case of libya -- >> he did the right thing in libya? >> yes. absolutely. >> what about syria? i remember covering it when you met with the father. isn't the son like the father and should the u.s. be more assertive in saying he like gadhafi should go? >> yes, the son is like the father and the father long
before i became president as you know quwiped out a whole villag. and he's been very, very ruthless and i think it surprised some of the people who have been supporting him. >> have you ever met him? >> to the best of my knowledge, i have not. but we have something we never had when i was president, we have this wonderful arab spring of people in the streets and syria has a lot of secular nonradical forces as well as the potential as all these countries do including egypt of going under control of nondemocratic extremi extremists. but president assad's had lots of opportunities to make peace with the israelis. they had this feeling based on their experience with his father that if he gave his word, he could keep it and he would keep it. and he declined.
he has continued to work with the iranians and with other elements to let terrorists pass through syria on the way to training elsewhere. and now he's depressing his own people and he's killed innocent civilians. so i think unless he can have a genuine broad based reform effort, which he could do there -- >> not too late after 1100, rye for him. but if i were in his position and i wanted to save my skin, my advice would be -- for me it's too late, i want him to go. but i would say, well, maybe i can survive this because all the people that really want me out of here, they're up to their ears in iraq and afghanistan and in libya. and they're worried about instability in bahrain and other places. so maybe i can survive this. but i got to quit killing people and bring everybody in.
now, my guess is it's too late for him. >> quick question on afghanistan. you and i lived through vietnam. are you concerned that afghanistan is becoming another vietnam war? >> no, because we've already -- for two reasons. one is we never got above 100,000 troops. two is we had more real support from the rest of the world, the united nations and nato and afghanistan than we ever had in vietnam. we can have some ally, australia and south korea and others. but never. and the third is the president has already announced that he will begin to drawdown our troop levels. on the other hand, i think it's a mind bendingly tough problem. we never wanted to dominate
them. so we they ever were trying to do what britain and russia failed to do. we didn't want to do that. we did want to nation build. and it was an honorable thing to do. and we may or may not succeed. and i think what the president said, we're going to try to keep those folks as safe as responsible and get it over with as quick as we can. >> i'm wrapping it up. i recently went with the secretary of state, hillary clinton, to paris, cairo and tunis and watched her closely just as i used to watch you closely when you were president of the united states. and watching her in those meetings, watching her in those sessions, i saw a lot of bill clinton when he was president of the united states. and here's the question. did she learn from you or did you learn from her? >> well, i would hope a little bit of both. but i've learned a great deal from her. when i fell in love with her and asked her to marry me, i said
almost in the same breath you probably shouldn't do this because i have to go home to arkansas and live my life. and i think you're the most gifted person i ever met in public service. i still feel that way. i'm very, very proud of her. >> she's doing an amazing job. >> yeah, i'm really proud of her. she's done a good job. >> how do you feel? >> as far as i know, i'm fine. >> how is that diet? >> it's good. i gained a little weight in the wintertime because it was the wintertime and because haiti has taken over a lot of my life and i don't quite exercise as much as i should, but i'm getting back in to shape. my goal is to try to get down to what -- where i weighed at chelsea's wedding which is what i weighed the day i graduated from high school and stay there. >> you lost 24 pounds. >> i hope i can stay there. >> a year ago we were this south africa 24 cape town watching the u.s. lose. >> in the world cup. that was a great match. >> a great match and had a lot of fun. >> we sure did. if you remember when mick jagger walked into that suite, that was
pretty exciting. >> it was a great night. >> mr. president, thanks very much. >> thanks, wolf. president obama visited a couple of key battle ground state this is week with two big name republicans nips at his heels. sarah palin was this iowa just hours after mr. obama fueling more speculation that possibly she could run for the white house. and the president and dand dat mitt romney both held fund-raisers in pennsylvania about 50 miles apart from one another. let's talk about the race for the white house. joining us joy johns and candy crowley. is it fair to say -- you heard president clinton suggest that romney and john hunthuntsman, h them and they may be the most foidable challengers to president obama's re-election. >> i think it's fair to say that whoever looks as though they might have the best chance of beating president obama is who democrats fear the most. and certainly the names that come up when you talk to democratic strategists, people
inside the campaign and say who worries you, actually their first answer is the economy. but their second answer always is, well, mitt romney looks strong. huntsman looks strong. but it will ebb and flow. but i think it always comes down to who looks as though he has the best chance against obama. >> money is one thing. romney looks pretty strong in fund-raising. hunt huntsman is a tremendous self-funder. it's pretty clear just from the fact that this administration hired huntsman, sent him 7,000 miles to the other side of the planet to be the ambassador. so, yeah, they've got some worries there with these guy, but it's still early. so anything can happen. >> a lot of people say these two guys, romney and huntsman, may have an easier time getting elected in a general election than winning the republican
nomination. >> that is probably always the case. it is always the case that the nomination by and large is in the hands of the moths conservative part of the republican party. and usually the most liberal part of the democratic party. and so then what happens is the most conservative voters in the country or the most liberal, but in this case the most conservative voters in the country get a nominee and then they put him out to the country and then the moderates go that may be too conservative. so we always talk about how you got to go to the right in the primary and move back to the center. i don't think this is any different. it does have the tea party which is a lot more together and collected than -- >> powerful. >> very powerful. so therefore they can be a great influence. but i don't think the story line is different. >> you always hear republicans talking about the most electable conservative. i was out in iowa last week chasing sarah palin around and there were a lot of people talking about michele bachmann. >> she's doing well. >> because she talks the talk
and she speaks to a lot of the social conservative its in iowa which is a jump-start if you do well there. but a lot of people say even if she does very well there and moves on, whatever, she'd have a real problem in a general. >> although she is moving up -- the most recent poll in new hampshire, she's moved up. romney is still way ahead in new hampshire, she could potentially win iowa, come in second or third in new hampshire. then it goes down to south carolina. >> sure. there are any number of scenarios you could put together. but also remember might be shael back man is probably the newest face of the new faces and was also the one who most recently had the headlines. and that always gives you a bump. when romney went out and announced, miss hole numbers rose. she went out and announced, her poll numbers rose. >> some have suggested michele bachmann in iowa could turn out to be the howard dean. you've heard of that analogy. >> i sure have. and you talk to people around
town and there were people talking about the idea of sarah palin getting in the race running against sort of canceling out michele bachmann because there's fear that she gets started like a house fire and then it all just sinks, which could leave some republicans in a bad position. >> and let's be cautious right now, this is still very, very early. >> very. >> because at this stage pour years ago -- >> it's fun. >> we were talking about president giuliani as a lot of viewers probably remember. >> and on the republican side, this was about the time when we were saying john mccain had not a very good chance and turned out to do quite well. >> all of a sudden huckabee came up and didn't necessarily turn out all that great either. all right, thanks very much. see you sunday on state of the union. have you into at good show lined up? >> we'll talk about the american dream, but we have suze orman to talk about financial security, russell simons, how he made it, and a little discussion about entrepreneurial and where are the jobs. >> sunday morning 9:00 a.m.
eastern. also noon. state of the union. guys, thank you very much. cnn embedded with u.s. troops in afghanistan when the taliban attacks and now we're following up with an exclusive look at what happens after the firefight. and a federal agency lease as huge office space but leave it is empty. we'll tell you how much u.s. taxpayer money is at risk of being wasted. we're talking millions. stay with us. you're in "the situation room." - a touch, a glance -- it can come along anywhere, anytime. and when it does, men with erectile dysfunction can be more confident in their ability to be ready with cialis for daily use. cialis for daily use is a clinically proven low-dose tablet you take every day, so you can be ready anytime the moment's right even if it's not every day. tell your doctor about your medical condition and all medications and ask if you're healthy enough for sexual activity. don't take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure.
[ man ] do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, stop taking cialis and call your doctor right away. [ male announcer ] ask your doctor if cialis for daily use is right for you. for a 30-tablet free trial offer, go to cialis.com. it's schwab at your fingertips wherever, whenever you want. one log in lets you monitor all of your balances and transfer between accounts, so your money can move as fast as you do. check out your portfolio, track the market with live updates. and execute trades anywhere and anytime the inspiration hits you. even deposit checks right from your phone. just take a picture, hit deposit and you're done. open an account today and put schwab mobile to work for you. my son and i never missed opening day. but with copd making it hard to breathe,
i thought those days might be over. so my doctor prescribed symbicort. it helps significantly improve my lung function, starting within 5 minutes. symbicort doesn't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden symptoms. with symbicort, today i'm breathing better, and that means... game on! symbicort is for copd, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema. it should not be taken more than twice a day. symbicort may increase your risk of lung infections, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. [ whistle ] with copd, i thought i might miss out on my favorite tradition. now symbicort significantly improves my lung function, starting within 5 minutes. and that makes a difference in my breathing. today i'm back with my favorite team. ask your doctor about symbicort. i got my first prescription free. call or click to learn more. [ male announcer ] if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help.
we have an exclusive report for you november. an american combat op attacked by taliban militants twice in 24 hours. cnn's nick payton walsh was there. >> reporter: everywhere you on afghanistan's eastern border, the choices aren't good. outpost caught between hills full of taliban. if the americans leave, militants from pakistan will flow through the valley. if they stay, then every few
days, this happens. the mortars hit the base. the last attack was long enough ago there's panic. they're worried the taliban have been preparing a big one. after days of nothing, the insurgents are getting attacked from all sides. >> come on, hustle up. >> reporter: they use mortars first, aiming fortal ban talibae hills. but the incoming fire is very accurate here. >> go, go, go! >> reporter: they arrange cover from heavy machine guns. but the bullets are too close. locals scatter. just before huge american fire power has the last word.
four massive air strikes across the hills and then the taliban fall silent. america knew why it came here, but isn't sure why it's staying. >> can we get like a police call for like cigarette butts? >> absolutely. >> reporter: ten minutes later, jets swoop into strafe the hills. a show of force for the taliban are now either gone or dead, at least five killed by the soldiers count. the next morning, it starts again. mortars and rocket propelled grenades pound the base. for a second time in just 15 hours, the place is under attack. much heavier this time and it appears they've taken casualties.
more air strikes. this valley is vital strateg strategically. the medics fly into collects one soldier. his injuries are not life threatening. there is no real victory to be had here, hoe. just a question of how long they will stay growing louder. nick payton walsh, afghanistan. very courageous journal list there. it's a huge empty space and it's on track to cost american taxpayers millions and millions of dollars. we're flook to an outrageous case of broken government in the united states. plus stephen colbert dives in to the world of campaign finance. but is the comedy central star really serious? oh common. and how can you talk to me about fiber while you are eating a candy bar? you enjoy that. i am. [ male announcer ] fiber beyond recognition. fiber one.
a huge office space leased by a federal agency is being held up as an example of outrageous government waste in the united states. the reason? it's empty. lisa sylvester has been doing great reporting on this story for us. part of her broken government series. what have you learned here? >> this lease is raising a lot of eyebrows. it was done without any approval and as it turns out, without the sec even having the money to rent the building. >> reporter: it's a gorgeous building with its own private sculpture garden, a fountain and lots and lots of space. but there are no workers here. no computer, no phones ringing, nothing. the securities and exchange commission leased nearly a million square feet of the constitution center fwhlg washington, d.c. at a cost of $557 million over it ten years for workers it never hired. that expanded space was in
addition to a brand new headquartereded near union station across town. in a scathing report, the inspector squn says the commission grossly overestimated the amount of space needed. the representative is equally outraged. >> shocked. i mean, shocked that we're look at budget cuts and a huge debt to find out that there's an agency that could go out during a weekend, find this property, secure the plroperty, sign the lease without any bids or any signoff, it's an outrage and a waste of money. >> reporter: july 2010, the sec signed a lease assuming it would have to hire about new workers. by october 2010, it was clear congress concerned about the deficit wasn't going to appropriate new funds. january of this year, the sec inspector general began investigating why the lease was even signed and around this november, the first rent check for the property will be due.
this building takes up an entire city brolock and it has spectacular views. you can see clear across the river to virginia. the sec originally leased about 900,000 square feet. when it said couldn't use the space it had to sublease it out to two other agencies. now what's left is about 350 square feet of just empty space. in a congressional hearing, the sec had two representatives testify, but neither could explain why basic procedures were not followed. >> i'm new to the position. i'm reviewing the current position and trying to improve -- fix that process going forward. so i can't speak to past operating practices other than to tell you as you've seen they were deeply flawed. >> reporter: we asked the sec it for an interview, but they declined. the head of the office of administrative services who signed the lease is still on the job and sistill in that positio.
now, the sec is unique as a federal agency because it has its own authority to lease buildings. other federal offices have to go through the general services administration. congress, though, is looking at revoking hae ining their leasiny and next wednesday there will be another hearing and the chairman has been called to test 235ify. he start the out mocking campaign finance and now stephen colbert is part of it. and jeanne moos with an embarrassing police blunder. would deliver e our next generation mobile broadband experience to 55 million more americans, many in small towns and rural communities, giving them a new choice. we'll deliver better service, with thousands of new cell sites... for greater access to all the things you want, whenever you want them. it's the at&t network... and what's possible in here is almost impossible to say.
what started out as a skit on his comedy central show has turned into a political action committee for the comedian stephen colbert who's shining a satirical spotlight on campaign finance. brian todd is here working the story. what is stephen colbert really doing? >> for a while on his show, he's been taking on the ever-loosening rules on campaign finance, aiming his jokes at a supreme court ruling last year that opened the doors for more corporate donation to campaigns. now in typical colbert fashion, he's parodying the system by
seemingly joining it. >> ladies and gentlemen, i am sorry to say we won! i am a super pac and so can you. >> reporter: in character as always, stephen colbert jumps into the mind-numbing world of campaign finance. the federal election commission gives the okay for the comedian to form his own so-called super pac, a political action committee that will be able to raise and spend unlimited money on ads for the 2012 campaign. it's part of colbert's ongoing satire, poking fun at last year's supreme court ruling that allowed corporations to spend whatever they want on elections. >> i don't know about you, but i do not expect limits on my free speech. [ cheers ] >> i don't know about you, but i do not accept the status quo. [ cheers ] >> but i do accept visa, masterca mastercard, and american express. >> reporter: he keeps the campaign pledge with a handy credit card swiper. >> we're doing it.
it's authorizing. >> thank you. >> thank you very much. how much can i put you down for? >> $50. >> abby? >> 50. >> 50? that's true american right there. >> reporter: the ruling means c colbert can use unlimited money from viacom to produce ads. if's not clear if viacom want to. if the ads run during the show, viacom doesn't have to disclose whether it produced them or how much it paid. if the ads run outside the network, they do have to report all that. what is the impact of today's decision on what super pacs can and can't do? >> i not the super pac -- i think the super pacs are here to stay. they're raising money now and will impact 2012. the colbert juadvisory opinion the sign of what role he's having in the process and is making fun of it. >> reporter: the ceo says a super pac like colbert's and a traditional she and that a standard kpak raise limited
amounts from individuals, can contribute to candidates and buy ads. a super pac, he says, can accept unlimited money from corporations or unions but cannot contribute to specific candidates. >> knock, knock -- >> who's there? >> unlimited union and corporate campaign contributions. >> reporter: so what's colbert going to do with the super pac? he's not given details about the content or when ads will air. he does joke that he's going to use money to determine the winner of the 2012 elections, wolf. whatever he comes up with is going to be hilarious. >> whatever he does is very, very, funny. thank you very much. jeanne moos is next with a police blunder. one log in lets you monitor all of your balances and transfer between accounts, so your money can move as fast as you do. check out your portfolio, track the market with live updates. and execute trades anywhere and anytime the inspiration hits you. even deposit checks right from your phone. just take a picture, hit deposit and you're done.
a major embarrassment for a seattle police officer. jeanne moos shows us. >> reporter: ever drive off with something sitting on your roof? imagine you're a cop and driving with this thing on your trunk. even as seattle police say -- >> that's a careless act. >> reporter: a semiautomatic assault rifle -- >> we're embarrassed. >> reporter: probably loaded say police, sitting unattended on the trunk of a pothole car parked in downtown seattle. passerby nick gonzalez snapped a
picture, alerted officers on bikes,nent sent the photo -- then sent the photo to the alternative newspaper "the stranger." sure was a strange sight. >> what? >> oops. that wasn't very smart. >> reporter: now it's one thing to leave, say, a cup of coffee on the roof and take off. but the gun apparently didn't fall off. a source confirms to cnn that one officer was unloading his car in the precinct garage. he set the rifle down on the trunk of a second car, then forgot it. a lieutenant came out, got in the car, and drove off with the gun on the trunk. she parked a few blocks away to stop at a starbucks, and that's when passersby spotted the rifle. the whole thing feels like a scene out of "there's some being mary." [ yelling ] >> reporter: ben stiller rests cameron diaz's dog in a body cast on the roof and forgets it and drives off.
♪ >> reporter: now when police do this with a gun, it would most likely be considered minor misconduct and result in a reprimand or a suspension of a day or two. of course, there are worse things you could leave on top of your car -- on the mtv series "jackass," they put a baby doll on the roof. >> stop the car! stop! hey! hey! stop! >> reporter: to say how folks would react. >> hey! hey! >> oh, my god. >> hey! hey! hey! stop! >> oh, my [ bleep ] >> reporter: the real mystery is how did that assault rifle not fall off on the drive to starbucks, though trug be told -- three, two, one -- we had to do a couple of takes because our coffee cup stuck. take off -- jeanne moos, cnn, new york. >> that's it for me. thank you very much for watching